Suppose you were not just the average good person that is supposed to help your fellow man in distress, but you were best of creed.
Suppose you were not restricted by time, budget, energy or resources.
Suppose you would know how to cure.
Suppose you are really committed to love.
Suppose you really, really care.
Suppose you could cure kid cancer by a sheer act of will.
Then would something hold you back to cure kid cancer immediately, permanently, thoroughly?
Whose moral would you trust, the moral of the benevolent omnipotent bystander that claims the creation of kid cancer, or the imperfect human medical scientist that puts his trust on reason to help the kid?
Posted by fujaro 